California Court of Appeal reviews case on marital status discrimination in auto insurance premiums under Proposition 103 and civil rights laws.

UnitedHealth Group moves to dismiss Ballad Health's Medicare Advantage lawsuit citing binding arbitration agreements and jurisdiction issues in federal court.

California appellate court ruling clarifies "occurrence" in homeowners insurance for intentional acts excluding coverage despite concurrent negligence findings in assault case.

The Connecticut Supreme Court rules that insurance brokers are not required to inform clients about non-renewal of homeowners insurance policies, defining broker duties and impacting insurance practices.

Ontario Superior Court rules $2.3 million aggregate insurance coverage limit in vehicular accident case involving 25 claimants, clarifying excess liability and family protection endorsements.

A federal appeals court in Michigan ruled that injuries from an ATV accident are not covered under standard auto insurance policies due to the vehicle's off-road design. This decision impacts coverage interpretation under Michigan's no-fault statute.

Maryland Supreme Court rulings clarify standards for postconviction DNA testing, timely settlement acceptance, and insurance claim assignments under anti-assignment clauses, guiding legal and insurance professionals.

Analysis of recent Georgia automotive tort verdicts reveals litigation strategies, insurer challenges, and implications of advancing tort reform legislation in automotive insurance claims.

Illinois proposes legislation to prevent life insurers from denying coverage based on criminal history, advancing inclusive underwriting reforms.

Connecticut's new law changes insurance dispute arbitration by requiring insurers to cover arbitration costs and pay interest on disputed amounts, promoting faster claimant payments and greater insurer accountability.